Thanks a lot to let us know your opinion. Keeping some controversial post in different place like archiving allowing for being part of history is a good option. But in terms of publishing, a content editor is more preferable than a moderator. We had marked a post of Trivuz which was an appeal to Muslim to fight back against others who condemn them. It's entirely a extremist motivation. The post may be kept in your archive but it has to be informed to the community with the reference of that post, that the content had the elements for brainwashing young minds and as such has to be discouraged to post once again.

I personally don’t feel disgraced for the post “who authored Koran?” but like to show my sympathy for those who’s belief was hurt by that. Now, I don’t go in against of that deletion showing my respect to the believers, but at the same time do not expect devastating appeal to stand against other beliefs.

This would be truly welcoming if you find a content editor who will communicate with the respective bloggers of controversial issues that may hamper public sentiment to a large scale and put the platform into a dismal situation.